Forschungszulage: What Does 'Systematic' Mean? (BSFZ)
What does 'systematic' (planmäßig) mean for the Forschungszulage? Misconceptions, practical examples and a checklist for your BSFZ application.
Many innovation projects look from the outside like "normal product development". But what is central to the Forschungszulage is whether your project has to resolve technical uncertainties. This is exactly where the BSFZ typically distinguishes routine (not eligible for funding) from genuine innovation with technical risk (often eligible for funding).
In short: without uncertainty, there is no eligible innovation in the sense of the Forschungszulage.
More context:
In the sense of the Forschungszulage, a project is "uncertain" if at the outset there is no precise prediction about:
Time/costs (context on expenditures):
Important: In practice, the BSFZ groups the individual aspects (novel, creative, uncertain, systematic, reproducible) into three overarching criteria: novelty, risk/uncertainty and systematic approach. "Uncertain" is primarily captured in the risk/uncertainty criterion.
Risk/uncertainty (requirements):
Technical risk (context):
Typical misconceptions:
Rule of thumb: Uncertainty must relate to scientific/technical obstacles that could in extreme cases lead to failure.
Practical examples:
Software/AI context:
More likely uncertain (eligible for funding possible):
More likely not uncertain (usually not eligible for funding):
Uncertainty usually met, as long as the prototype/system serves to:
Once the testing phase is complete and it is "only" moving towards production/zero series, the eligible part often ends.
Can be uncertain, if data collection/analysis is an integral part of the technical solution, e.g.:
Usually not uncertain, if:
Help with the project description:
Describe not only "what you are building", but why it is technically uncertain:
If you wish, you can often structure your uncertainty in 2–3 sentences like this:
The Forschungszulage is a tax-based innovation incentive for companies – technology-neutral and close to practice. The process is typically two-stage:
If you clearly work out the criterion "uncertain", the path to the certificate often becomes considerably easier.
More on this (internal):
Official information:
That at the outset it is unclear whether and how the technical objective can be achieved. It is about scientific/technical uncertainties, not market or pricing risks.
No, not on their own. Time/costs can be a side effect of technical uncertainty – but what matters is that the feasibility or the technical outcome is uncertain.
No. Uncertainty means precisely that failure is possible. Abandonment or failure is not an exclusion criterion if the R&D/innovation criteria are met. ( /blog/forschungszulage-rejected-what-to-do)
Usually not. Standard implementations, customising, integration and routine development are generally not considered uncertain. Uncertainty typically only arises with new algorithms, new architectures, unusual conflicts of objectives or unresolved technical hurdles.
We help you structure your innovation project so that uncertainty (technical risk), novelty and systematic approach are presented clearly and verifiably in the application – so you can make the best use of the Forschungszulage. ( /guides/berechnung)
Drop us a line about what's on your mind — we'll get back to you personally and without obligation.
What does 'systematic' (planmäßig) mean for the Forschungszulage? Misconceptions, practical examples and a checklist for your BSFZ application.
What does Neuartig (novelty) mean for the Forschungszulage? Practical examples for software, AI and new contexts — plus how to demonstrate novelty for BSFZ.
What does 'Schoepferisch' mean for the Forschungszulage? How to distinguish R&D from routine work, with examples and BSFZ-ready formulations.
Key Forschungszulage and BSFZ terms explained simply: novelty, uncertainty, systematic approach and more. Avoid common mistakes in your application.