Sampling head of an automated laboratory analyser above reagent cassettes

Forschungszulage for MedTech & HealthTech: fund the R&D, separate the regulatory work

Implants, sensors, AI diagnostics, interoperability: in MedTech and HealthTech the expensive work sits in iterations, validation and interfaces, not in the label on the product. That is exactly the work the Forschungszulage funds, at 25% of eligible R&D costs, or 35% for SMEs. The craft lies in demarcating development from approval and compliance work. We handle the application, you invest less than 5 hours across 4 calls.

funding rate for SMEs
35%funding rate for SMEs
success-based
100%success-based
success rate of our applications
92%success rate of our applications

What counts as eligible in MedTech and HealthTech

What matters is never the label (“AI”, “MedTech”, “digital”) but the question of which technical uncertainty you resolve systematically, and how you make that demonstrable. That is exactly what the BSFZ assesses, against three criteria. What the individual characteristics mean:

NoveltyCreativeUncertaintySystematic

Medical devices and implants

New implants, materials or surface structures whose behaviour in use only becomes reliable through systematic test series.

Miniaturised sensors

Sensors at the limit of size, signal quality and power budget, where it is open whether the required measurement accuracy is achievable.

AI-assisted diagnostics

Image and signal analysis where detection rate, robustness and bias can only be settled against real clinical data.

Interoperability and interfaces

Connecting to HIS, PMS and devices where genuine technical risk sits behind it. Wiring up a standard API on its own does not qualify.

Digital care solutions

Telemedicine, digital therapy support or patient management with new decision logic and data-driven models, rather than plain implementation.

Manufacturing and testing processes

Production or test procedures for medical devices whose process window and reproducibility you still have to work out.

A project is rarely entirely in or entirely out. Pure approval and compliance work is not eligible; the development work before and alongside it often is. For clinical studies it depends on the R&D character of the specific phase. That is why a clean demarcation in the application decides the size of the funding.

Not sure where the line between development and regulatory work runs in your case? That is exactly what we sort out in a call, 5 minutes are enough for a first assessment.

Clarify the scope in a call

Which costs you can claim

In MedTech and HealthTech the effort mostly sits with people: development, data work, validation, integration. From 2026 an overhead flat rate is added — but it comes with a condition.

Personnel costs
100% claimable: development, algorithms, data preparation, testing and validation, proportional to R&D time
Contract research
70% of the fee for external R&D contracts (for expenditure up to 27.03.2024: 60%), e.g. specialist laboratories or development partners, contractors based in the EU/EEA
Depreciation
On newly acquired movable assets used exclusively for R&D, e.g. test and measurement equipment (acquired after 27.03.2024)
Overhead flat rate
A 20% flat rate on direct project costs, but only for projects starting in 2026 or later. Ongoing projects do not benefit automatically
Own contributions
€100/h for work from 2026 (until the end of 2025: €70/h), for sole traders and partners, max. 40 hours per week
Funding rate
25% of eligible expenditure, 35% for SMEs
Assessment base
Up to €12 million per year from 2026 (28.03.2024 to the end of 2025: €10 million, before that €4 million); retroactive applications are capped at the limits in force at the time

Common doubts

The typical MedTech misconceptions

Three sentences that come up in almost every first call, and what actually applies:

“We are developing a product, not running a study.”

The Forschungszulage requires neither a clinical study nor a publication. What is funded is the development work itself, as soon as it resolves an open technical question, in the material, the surface, miniaturisation, sensor technology or an algorithm.

“We build software, that is not research.”

The Forschungszulage is technology-neutral. Algorithm development, robustness and bias work, data preparation and system integration with demonstrable technical risk can be R&D. What is not eligible is UI/UX work and wiring up standard interfaces without technical uncertainty.

“Our development is just adapting to a standard.”

Knowing a standard is routine; hitting its values often is not. If that forces you to redesign material, construction, sensor technology or an algorithm and validate it in testing, that is exactly where the technical uncertainty sits. The regulatory work around it stays out and is cleanly separated in the application.

Do you recognise yourself in one of these sentences? Then let's clarify in a call what actually counts in your case.

Check your eligibility in a call

8 benefits

Why is the Forschungszulage a good funding option?

Compared to traditional funding programmes, the Forschungszulage is the better choice for most companies.

  • 1

    No competition for budgets: if the criteria are met, funding must be granted.

  • 2

    Up to 4 years retroactive

    Even completed projects can still be funded.

  • 3

    Open to all industries

    Software, mechanical engineering, MedTech, construction: R&D is R&D, whatever the industry.

  • 4

    Even without profit

    No tax burden needed, the allowance is paid out as a credit.

  • 5

    Less bureaucracy

    No upfront project plan, no interim reports, no proof of use.

  • 6

    Fully digital process

    Application via BSFZ portal and ELSTER, no paper, no postal mail.

  • 7

    Thematically open

    No rigid topic catalogue: product development, process innovation, everything counts.

  • 8

    Broad cost base

    Personnel costs, contract research and capital assets are eligible.

From real projects

Real projects from this industry, with the funding amounts that were actually approved.

Scaneca
MedTech

Mobile body scanners: a virtual copy of the body, posture analysis, and health-related parameters in a single measurement process. 280,000€ in Forschungszulage for developing the 3D body scanners.

Scaneca

MedTech280,000€ Forschungszulage

Read case study →
voize
AI & Healthcare

AI-powered voice documentation for nursing care. 315,000€ in Forschungszulage for advancing their AI models.

voize

YW22AI & Healthcare315,000€ Forschungszulage

Read case study →

Common questions from MedTech & HealthTech

Projects in which you systematically resolve technical uncertainties: new implants, materials and surface structures, miniaturised sensors, AI-assisted diagnostics, interoperability and interface development, algorithms for medical data including robustness and bias reduction, and new manufacturing or testing processes. The innovation core has to be substantiated technically; you do not need a world first.
The approval work itself is not. Regulatory and administrative activities around approval, registration and compliance do not count as R&D. The development work that runs before or alongside it and resolves technical uncertainties can be eligible. In the application, both parts have to be separated and the innovative one derived technically.
There is no blanket answer; it depends on the R&D character of the specific phase. Study and evaluation phases that primarily serve approval documentation are generally not certifiable. If an investigation settles an open technical question within the development project, it can belong to the eligible part. What matters is what you resolve technically and how you document it.
Yes, if there is a recognisable technical core. Typically eligible are data problems, performance limits, robustness questions and integration risks that you solve systematically. Not eligible are product maintenance and plain implementation, and neither is UI/UX work or wiring up standard integrations, as long as there is no technical uncertainty behind them. The difference is in the description: not “we are building AI”, but which technical hurdle you clear and by what approach.
Personnel costs are the biggest block and 100% claimable, proportional to R&D time. Added to that: contract research at 70% of the fee for contractors in the EU/EEA and depreciation on movable assets used exclusively for R&D. From 2026 the assessment base rises to €12 million per year (28.03.2024 to the end of 2025: €10 million, before that €4 million) and there is an additional 20% overhead flat rate on direct project costs, but only for projects starting in 2026 or later. Own contributions of sole traders and partners count at €100/h from 2026, and at €70/h until the end of 2025.
Yes. Expenditure can be claimed retroactively as long as the assessment period of the relevant tax assessment is still open, regularly 4 years. What matters is less “the project year” than the point in time at which the expenditure was incurred, and in some cases when the project started. In practice, these key dates cause the most damage.
Yes, two documented cases: 314,825€ in Forschungszulage was secured for voize's AI-assisted care documentation, and 280,000€ for Scaneca's mobile 3D body scanners. In both cases the eligible core was not in the product promise but in iterations, validation, integration and stabilisation. Both projects are written up as case studies on the blog.

First clarify what really is R&D at your company

In a first call we sort your development projects into place: which part is eligible, where the line to approval work runs, and which costs you can realistically claim. 5 minutes are enough for a first assessment.

Before you go

How much Forschungszulage is your company entitled to?

We'll review your profile and email you a personal assessment of your funding potential.

We'll pull this automatically from your email — you can adjust it.

Free & no obligation. We'll get back to you personally, no newsletter spam.